<title type="main">M. J. Cook to Thomas E. Bramlette Edition created from new transcripts of this manuscript. Initial upload of this work's facsimile images and metadata to FromThePage for editing Kentucky Historical Society Digital Collections Administrator of the CWGK Migration transcription project on FromThePage Kentucky Historical Society Digital Collections Kentucky Historical Society Digital Collections made 4 edits between June 21, 2025 and June 21, 2025. Dynamic TEI export from FromThePage (version 22.10)

This image and transcription is publicly accessible. The image appears courtesy of the repository named in the Source Description. The transcription and annotation were undertaken by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. If referencing this document title, accession number, and permanent URL.

 November 11, 2025 Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867 KYR-0001-004-0568 BR9-402 to BR9-403

Mount Vernon, Rockcastle County, Kentucky Mount Vernon, Rockcastle County, Kentucky 1864-03-14 Correspondence English Version 1 of page "4": Changes to page transcript. Version 0 of page "4": Empty transcript -- probably initial upload of page facsimile. Version 1 of page "3": Changes to page transcript. Version 0 of page "3": Empty transcript -- probably initial upload of page facsimile. Version 1 of page "2": Changes to page transcript. Version 1 of page "1": Changes to page transcript. Version 0 of page "2": Empty transcript -- probably initial upload of page facsimile. Version 0 of page "1": Empty transcript -- probably initial upload of page facsimile.
1

Mt. Vernon Ky March the 14" 1864, Gov. T E. Bramlette

Dear Sir I learn that a petition has been sent to you to remit a fine against one Liberty Langford of this (Rockcastle) County,

To which I do most respectfully remonstrate, for the following reasons,

2

He was fined ($160) dollars for obstructing a County Road by putting a fence across it in one place and gates in other places without the proper orders to do so, it was proved before the Jury that he was told when building the fence that he would be fined that he was violating law and putting the neighborhood through which the road run to great inconvinience and leaving the road almost impassible, the grand Jury presented Langford for the obstructions, and for which he was fined from August to the Feb Court 1863. The grand Jury presented him again from Feb 63. to August court 1863, Langford was also presented for obstructing a county ^Road^ that led to Griffins Mill at the same time and in the same number of cases, which made four presentments for obstructing county roads, the indictments or presentments that was got against him from Feb to August was throwed out of court on some techniclality; he had a fair an impartial trial before a Jury of his County, with three or four able counsel to defend him and he was fined because he was guilty Knowingly and wilfully: guilty the commonwealths Atty, after being teased a great deal agreed to dismiss the second indictment if he would pay off the one found against him, under the promise that he would remove the obstructions & c, Langford agreed; but since I learn that he is petitioning your Excellency to remit his fine, to which I seriously object, To make him pay this fine would be of incalculable benefit to the community, from the fact that Langford is called a wealthy man for the county, and it would deter him as well

3

others from committing similar offences, with the view of getting the fine remitted if fined; his lawyers got up the petition and I dont suppose a signer ^on it^ lives in the neighborhood of the road so obstructed, it is an easy matter to get up signers at a court where people are not interested and know not the parties, This road is in my immediate neighborhood, and I have heard the case in full, and for the forgoing reasons do most Respectfully remonstate against the remission of the fine,

M J, Cook

The above is true W W Fish C. R. C. C Edwin Shivel C S C R C

4

Rockcastle Co Refused Tho E Bramlette