<title type="main">W. B. Hoke to Thomas E. Bramlette Edition created from new transcripts of this manuscript. Initial upload of this work's facsimile images and metadata to FromThePage for editing Kentucky Historical Society Digital Collections Administrator of the CWGK Migration transcription project on FromThePage Kentucky Historical Society Digital Collections Kentucky Historical Society Digital Collections made 2 edits between June 21, 2025 and June 21, 2025. Dynamic TEI export from FromThePage (version 22.10)

This image and transcription is publicly accessible. The image appears courtesy of the repository named in the Source Description. The transcription and annotation were undertaken by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. If referencing this document title, accession number, and permanent URL.

 November 11, 2025 Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867 KYR-0001-004-0684 BR10-47

Petition English Version 1 of page "2": Changes to page transcript. Version 1 of page "1": Changes to page transcript. Version 0 of page "2": Empty transcript -- probably initial upload of page facsimile. Version 0 of page "1": Empty transcript -- probably initial upload of page facsimile.
1

To His Excellency -- Thomas. E. Bramlette Gov of the Comm of Ky

Your Pettitioner W. B. Hoke, says that in the Summer of 1863- George Kenniston and Robert Johnston were ^keepers of a^ Coffee house in Louisville Ky. That they were indicted for allowing gambling in their house, and by the Judge of the Police Court held to bail in the sum of Three Hundred dollars. He says that he knew the men, and believed them not guilty of knowingly allowing Card playing for money in their house -- He says they were poor men and were kept in Jail some three or four days before he consented to bail them, and that one of them was in bad health and spitting blood whilst in Jail. He says that one of them a short while before he went into the liquor business was a te^a^mster near Nashville Tenn -- owning his wagon and four horses and that these (his all) were taken by John Morgan. This petitioner says that after he went these parties bail, theymadeseveralappearancesintheCourtand with their witnessses ready for trial. That theCommonwealthcontinuedtheCaseexcept the last time when their witnesses for Defts had Scattered and gone. He says that one of the Defts had obtained employment upon

2

a Government vessel and that it was with great trouble that he got the consent of the officers of said vessel to leave and make his appearance in Court. He says after so many continuances and the appearances of Defts, they could not get a trial, and have got away from this locality and the bail has been forfeited. He says that after one of the parties had left -- he Telegraphed here from St Louis Mo, stating that he could not leave the Boat, and again he wrote from Paducah Ky stating thereir boat was there and his officers would not give him leave of absence- Since this he has not heard from either of them. He says they did not intentionally forfeit their Bail, and if here he believes they would have been acquitted.

This Petitioner says that he has paid the amount going to the prosecuting Attorney, and that the payment of the balance is a hard case. as the accused, could not help the forfeiture, as he believes

Wherefore he prays that your excellency will remit the forfeiture, and as in duty bound he will ever pray.

Respectfully Your obed servant W. B. Hoke

Remit except fees & costs Refused Thos E Bramlette