<title type="main">W. H. Sandford to Smith Wingate Edition created from new transcripts of this manuscript. Initial upload of this work's facsimile images and metadata to FromThePage for editing Kentucky Historical Society Digital Collections Administrator of the CWGK Migration transcription project on FromThePage Kentucky Historical Society Digital Collections Kentucky Historical Society Digital Collections made one edit on June 21, 2025. Dynamic TEI export from FromThePage (version 22.10)

This image and transcription is publicly accessible. The image appears courtesy of the repository named in the Source Description. The transcription and annotation were undertaken by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. If referencing this document title, accession number, and permanent URL.

 November 11, 2025 Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867 KYR-0001-004-0980 BR11-17 to BR11-18

Louisville, Jefferson County, Kentucky Louisville, Jefferson County, Kentucky 1864-06-08 Correspondence English Version 1 of page "1": Changes to page transcript. Version 0 of page "1": Empty transcript -- probably initial upload of page facsimile.
1

Louisville Ky June 8th/64 Smith Wingate Esqr Dear Sir

In answer to your letter requesting a statement from me as to my recollection of the agreement between you & R Hutchinson late atto for the Comth. I state from the best of my recollection that, it was agreed between you & him that W B. Vallandingham should take his case (a similar one to yours) to the Court of Appeals, and that your case would abide the decision in Vallandinghams case. That case was taken to the Court of Appeals & I understand reversed. And no action was had in your case from Nov 1853 until this winter, when a capias pro fine was issued at the instance of T S Haydon agent for the Auditor.

Resptfy. W H Sandford