This image and transcription is publicly accessible. The image appears courtesy of the repository named in the Source Description. The transcription and annotation were undertaken by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. If referencing this document title, accession number, and permanent URL.
Com'th vs Timothy King
Coroner Gill in addition stated that the pistol shot wound was in the back of deceased --
Bridget Casey also stated that she Knew of no cause of jealousy between accused & deceased, stated that she worked as a hired girl for her living
Peter Larson did not state that he "did not recognise the accused as the man who shot deceased" but stated that although he saw the man who did the shooting he would now be unable to identify him
Mrs story also stated that she would be unable to recognize or identify the man who fired the pistol & could not tell whether accused was the man or not
Julia Brady stated that she thought that accused did not leave the house untill about ten minutes after the deceased and Bridget Casey left. -- he talked with me during the time pleasantly enough.
The affidavit made by accused for continuance states that he met Million (not a the door of Bradleys as stated in counsels notes) after he had left Bradleys & that they were on guard -- (but notlate at night)
When arrested he put on a blouse (dark) & a white hat of the description worn by him, was also found in the room he slept in. he was arrested in bed, about 21 o'clock at night.
J R Dupuy
not having any notes by me the above are about the only points on which I differ with counsel as to the testimony in the Case -- I think the testimony as written out by counsel with corrections by me contains as near the substance of testimony in the case as I can remember --
D