R. Richardson, Affidavit
1863-09-04
- Date of Creation
- September 4, 1863
- Document Genre
- Legal/Financial
- Repository
- Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
- Collection
- Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867
- Box / Folder
- BR8-94 to BR8-95
- CWGK Accession Number
- KYR-0001-004-0063
- Rights
- This image and its transcription are freely available to the public. Images appear courtesy of Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Transcriptions and annotations were created by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. When referencing this document, please use our preferred citation.; The use of transcriptions, images, or annotations from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce any material on CWGK is required.
- FTP Identifier
- 32202950
- Dates
- 1863-09-04
Citation
R. Richardson, Affidavit, 1863-09-04, Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Accessed via the Civil War Governors of Kentucky Digital Documentary Edition, https://discovery.civilwargovernors.org/document/KYR-0001-004-0063 (November 12, 2026).
I am counsel for Mr Isaac Sutton, the petitioner.
It is morally certain to my mind that he failed to pay the $10. State tax on city license, because of ignorance on his part of the law, and without the remotest design to evade it. Accompanying certificates show that he has paid in all the sum of $16567 on a/c of city license
On trial of his case he exhibited his certificates of city license in attestation of
his good faith, plead that he was ignorant of the law as to county license; and produced also a certificate that he had paid the small amount of this county license soon as he discovered it was his duty to do so. These defenses were adjudged insufficient. The jury were virtually instructed to find against deft.; but his honor Judge Doniphan remarked on the bench the case was one which well merited Executive clemency
R. Richardson
Isaac Suttons petn
Statement of R; Richardson
