Logan A. Wood, Brief
- Document Genre
- Legal/Financial
- Repository
- Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
- Collection
- Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867
- Box / Folder
- BR8-364
- CWGK Accession Number
- KYR-0001-004-0234
- Rights
- This image and its transcription are freely available to the public. Images appear courtesy of Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Transcriptions and annotations were created by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. When referencing this document, please use our preferred citation.; The use of transcriptions, images, or annotations from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce any material on CWGK is required.
- FTP Identifier
- 32203121
Citation
Logan A. Wood, Brief, Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Accessed via the Civil War Governors of Kentucky Digital Documentary Edition, https://discovery.civilwargovernors.org/document/KYR-0001-004-0234 (November 14, 2026).
Jefferson Circuit court
Commonwealth Ky Plff
vs } Brief for Straus, before the Governor
Andrew Straus Deft
I would Suggest to your Excellency, that this is a case pending in the Jefferson Circuit court of The Commonwealth vs Andrew Straus — a Scirefacias on an old bail-bond given in
There is no Judgemt yet against Straus- the Summons was not Served in time for the
For your power to remit the whole of it I refer you to "Article 3d Section 10 of "The New Consitution Ky". Stanton's Rev. Statutes page 129 of 1st Vol.
And also the case of Commonwealth vs Morgan 14. B Monroe 392. And the Commonwealth vs Spraggins. 18. B. Monroe 513.
I would not be understood as diseng
to deprive the officers of the Circuit court of their legitimate fees — nor the Commonwealth's atty. But this is a case wherein the ^present^ States attorney has had no trouble; nor would he ever have set this prosecution on foot — if it had not been for this man Fherrenback. It appears to me that this is a case where excutive interposition is demanded. The Commonwealth Should not be made the instrument through and by which to grati the personal Spite of one individual citizen toward another=; and especially where no public good can result from it, as in this case. The Judgmt against F. is about all Straus is worth; and if he is made to pay the $800 recognizance it will ruin him.
Respectfully
L. A. Wood
Commonwealth
vs
Straus,
