L. A. Wood to Thomas E. Bramlette
1865-02-23
- Date of Creation
- February 23, 1865
- Place of Creation
- Louisville, Jefferson County, Kentucky
- Document Genre
- Correspondence
- Repository
- Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
- Collection
- Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867
- Box / Folder
- BR8-487
- CWGK Accession Number
- KYR-0001-004-0310
- Rights
- This image and its transcription are freely available to the public. Images appear courtesy of Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Transcriptions and annotations were created by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. When referencing this document, please use our preferred citation.; The use of transcriptions, images, or annotations from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce any material on CWGK is required.
- FTP Identifier
- 32203197
Citation
L. A. Wood to Thomas E. Bramlette, 1865-02-23, Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Accessed via the Civil War Governors of Kentucky Digital Documentary Edition, https://discovery.civilwargovernors.org/document/KYR-0001-004-0310 (November 12, 2026).
L. A. WOOD
ATTORNEY AT LAW,
LOUISVILLE, KY.
OFFICE NO. 15 COURT PLACE.
Louisville, Ky
His Excellency Gov. Thos. E. Bramlette
Frankfort Ky
Dear Sir:
As. I. was conizant of all the facts and circumstances in the case of Wm Schofieldfrom his arrest up to his conviction, I deem it proper, to State that without going into a detailed account of the facts & circumStances, that they were wholy inSufficient in my opinion to establish his guilt. I was his counsel up until he told me that he was going to plead guilty- He Still told me that he was not guilty; but Said he had rather plead guilty and get, (as he hoped by pleading guilty he would) only one year, than to lie in Jail until the next term of the court.
I talked with his witness Some time before the trial, and if they could have been got there. I think ybeyond a doubt that there testimony would have inSured an acquittal. But they had, Some of them left the State and others of them we did not know where they were; and he Said rather than lie in jail to the next court he would plead guilty. I then refused to defend him; and did not defend him on the trial. I have no contingent fee in this case; nor am I to be benefitted a farthing by his being pardoned. But I never did believe he Stole
the money; and I do not believe that the public weal requires that he Should be retained in Prison. And as it would So rejoice the hearts of his distressed motherand the whole family I do hope you will pardon him
Yours Truly
L,, A. Wood
