G. P. Hawkins to Thomas E. Bramlette
1864-03-30
- Date of Creation
- March 30, 1864
- Place of Creation
- Nicholasville, Jessamine County, Kentucky
- Document Genre
- Correspondence
- Repository
- Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
- Collection
- Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867
- Box / Folder
- BR9-456 to BR9-457
- CWGK Accession Number
- KYR-0001-004-0602
- Rights
- This image and its transcription are freely available to the public. Images appear courtesy of Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Transcriptions and annotations were created by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. When referencing this document, please use our preferred citation.; The use of transcriptions, images, or annotations from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce any material on CWGK is required.
- FTP Identifier
- 32203489
The Civil War Governors of Kentucky editors are working on annotations for this document. Check back to explore the people, places, organizations mentioned in this document.
Citation
G. P. Hawkins to Thomas E. Bramlette, 1864-03-30, Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Accessed via the Civil War Governors of Kentucky Digital Documentary Edition, https://discovery.civilwargovernors.org/document/KYR-0001-004-0602 (November 14, 2026).
Nicholasville Ky
Gov Bramlett
D Sir
Mr Martin Hunter of Jessamine County was convicted upon an Indictment for suffering Gameing and fined Two Hundred dollars & costs at the
I was in court and heard all the evidence upon the trial and was supprised that the Jury should upon the evidence find him guilty, One witness (who admited that he was hostile to the defendant Hunter) stated that upon one occasion he was at the Distilery of Hunter and same Hunter and others playing cards and upon that game a treat was bet. One of the partys who the witness represented to have plaid in the game, hapened to be in court
and stated that he had plaid cards with Hunter but alone for amusement and never for money or property. That he had frequently or several times plaid at Hunters still house for amusement. And upon that proof above the jury found Hunter guilty
Mr Hunter is an industrious business young man of more than ordinary energy and application and I believe him to be reliable
I would therefore aske your Exelency if consistent to official duty to releas Mr Hunter from said fine &c.
Mr Hunter was also Indicted at the same court for keeping a Tipling House upon the testimony above of the same witness in two cases. and under the impression that the witness would state any thing that was necessary to a conviction, and the advice of his council and by agreement to have one case dismissed, he confessed judgment in the other, which he
says is untrue and unjust that he never at any time suffered Tipling on his premises. and that he was alone induced to confess judgment on the one case from the causes above stated and from the further part that it would be impossible to disprove the statement of the witness.
From my Knowledge of Hunter and the information that has been given me in relation to the witness who was percecuting him. I am of the opinion that Hunters statement is entitled to credit.
Most respectfully
your obdt servt
G P Hawkins
