Z. Wheat to Thomas E. Bramlette
1864-04-19
- Date of Creation
- April 19, 1864
- Place of Creation
- Shelbyville, Shelby County, Kentucky
- Document Genre
- Correspondence
- Repository
- Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
- Collection
- Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867
- Box / Folder
- BR10-16
- CWGK Accession Number
- KYR-0001-004-0662
- Rights
- This image and its transcription are freely available to the public. Images appear courtesy of Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Transcriptions and annotations were created by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. When referencing this document, please use our preferred citation.; The use of transcriptions, images, or annotations from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce any material on CWGK is required.
- FTP Identifier
- 32203549
The Civil War Governors of Kentucky editors are working on annotations for this document. Check back to explore the people, places, organizations mentioned in this document.
- Dates
- 1864-04-19
Citation
Z. Wheat to Thomas E. Bramlette, 1864-04-19, Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Accessed via the Civil War Governors of Kentucky Digital Documentary Edition, https://discovery.civilwargovernors.org/document/KYR-0001-004-0662 (November 12, 2026).
Shelbyville Ky
Gov. Bramlette
Dear Sir
I write to solicit a remission of a fine of $10. imposed on W M Heaton by a verdict & Judgment in the Police Court of this Town.
Heaton is a Poor honest mechanic of this Town & was doubtless improperly dealt with on his trial. Jury not not here, or I think a different result would have been had.
From the best information I can get, Heaton was not at all to blame. He is a Loyal man, Picket is not. The witnesses to the transaction are also secessionists, I could not remember what
threats Picket made, although he had drawn a pistol & presented it at Heaton, before Heaton opened his mouth, & Swore he would blow his brains out if he spoke or even batted his eye. Heatons Pistol was in his belt, under his coat, buckled in the case, & he had to wait till Picketts eye was off him, before he could draw in safety. He drew, but Picket shot first & just as Heaton drew his weapon Heaton, made him cower & get out of the way.
The most of the jury who tried the case are secessionists.
This case is a small one, but is an outrage, from which I hope you will redeem Heaton, by remitting the
fine. You know, I trust, that I would not solicit this, if I did not believe it to be right.
Yours &c
Z Wheat
