The commonwealth
v. } Indictment Kenton —
Micheal More

To the govenor of Kentucky Your Petitioner Micheal More states that a Judgt. was rendered agt. him at the present march term of the Kenton circuit court — for $100⁰⁰ on an indictment (for suffering a nusance, in a house owned by him in Covington.)

He states that it was in proof in substance, that he had owned the house about one year before march 1865 — the time of the trial of the indictment — & that he had notice some 7 or 8 months before the trial in march, that some of the occupants — his tenants, were Lewed women & some of the men thieves — there was no proof that he knew the character of any of the women or men were of bad character when he rented the house — He had them removed from the premises in Jay. 1865.

It was also stated that on one or two occasions there was some fighting in front of the house —

It was also in proof that the men who were living in the house were solders & the womens: [their] wives —

Now your petitioner states, that he did not know the character of these soldiers or their wives — when the house was rented — & that after he was informed of their character — only about three months, before he was indicted — he could not remove them — He was informed that he could have: to no process agt. Soldier wives to turn them out — and that he did cause them to remove aso soon as he could do so —

He asks for a remission of the fine —

Michael Moore

I heard the testimony in the above case — it iswas substantially as stated above — I do not beleive that [More] could have removed the persons from the house, sooner, than was done after he was informed of their character — I know More well & do not think he

would, Suffer such persons to live in his houses if he could have prevented it — I am satisfied that the fine ought to be remitted — I was his atto — defending —

Jas. Pryor

We heard the testimony — The statement of it by More is, in Substance cerrict. we ask that the fine may be remitted —

I Was one of the Jury & I think the Fine to Heavy For the offence

Thomas Reed.

I heard none of the evidence, but I know Moore, whilst the parties were said to be in his house he frequently expressed to me his anxiety to get them out of his house. I do not believe Moore would willingly Keep such persons in his house.

[G] M Moore

I agree with the above

N, A,Preston Mayor, C, C,

has used the means to get the possession of Said House and the late Law prohibated him and Several others See acts (63-4 p 48

Benj Egelston J. P. K. C

I was one of the Jury in this Case and Believe the Statement of Squeer Benj Egelston and L. M. Rease Substantially true,
N. W. Bowen