William A. Brann, Affidavit
1865-04-03
- Date of Creation
- April 3, 1865
- Document Genre
- Legal/Financial
- Repository
- Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
- Collection
- Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867
- Box / Folder
- BR13-146
- CWGK Accession Number
- KYR-0001-004-1671
- Rights
- This image and its transcription are freely available to the public. Images appear courtesy of Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Transcriptions and annotations were created by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. When referencing this document, please use our preferred citation.; The use of transcriptions, images, or annotations from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce any material on CWGK is required.
- FTP Identifier
- 32204558
The Civil War Governors of Kentucky editors are working on annotations for this document. Check back to explore the people, places, organizations mentioned in this document.
Citation
William A. Brann, Affidavit, 1865-04-03, Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Accessed via the Civil War Governors of Kentucky Digital Documentary Edition, https://discovery.civilwargovernors.org/document/KYR-0001-004-1671 (November 12, 2026).
To the governor of Kentucky
I certify that I presided over a writ of John Marshall against Johnane Marshall for her good behavior in pendleton county in the year 1863 for which the proof in case did not amount to any thing serious though the Judgment was for the defendant to appear at the next circuit court held in Said cty, for which he gave bond in the Sum of $250,00 with P S Ransom W, G, Wilson & P. Louis Security.
as I am informed the defendant was a way from home at the time of trial and the Securities lost Sight of the case and failed to attend to it
and Judgment was rendered on the bond, it appears that the defendant lost Sight of the time of trial and the Securities also lost sight of the case Supposing it was all settled, as the plantif was the fatherinlaw of deft and I have heard no complaint of the defendants behavior Sinse that time given this
Wm A Brann J p p C
$25000
Jugt