Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Jason Ladd, Judgment
1863-03
- Date of Creation
- March 1863
- Document Genre
- Legal/Financial
- Repository
- Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
- Collection
- Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867
- Box / Folder
- BR13-414
- CWGK Accession Number
- KYR-0001-004-1848
- Rights
- This image and its transcription are freely available to the public. Images appear courtesy of Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Transcriptions and annotations were created by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. When referencing this document, please use our preferred citation.; The use of transcriptions, images, or annotations from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce any material on CWGK is required.
- FTP Identifier
- 32204735
The Civil War Governors of Kentucky editors are working on annotations for this document. Check back to explore the people, places, organizations mentioned in this document.
Citation
Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Jason Ladd, Judgment, 1863-03, Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Accessed via the Civil War Governors of Kentucky Digital Documentary Edition, https://discovery.civilwargovernors.org/document/KYR-0001-004-1848 (November 12, 2026).
Christian Circuit Court
The Commonwealth of Kentucky
against } Indictment
Jason Ladd
The Grand Jury of Christian County, in the name, and by the authority of the Commonwealth of Kentucky: accuse Jason Ladd of the offense of takingupandsellingastraymulewithinlesstime thantwoyears โ
Committed as follows viz: โ The Said Jason Ladd on the
C. M. Callis J G McClellan
Foreman Grand Jury
E P Campbell
Comths atty
And afterwards, to wit, on the
"The Comlths atty appeared, and the Defendant not appearing, although duly summoned, a Plea of 'Not Guilty as charged' is entered by the Court for him, and the following Jury were sworn to try the issue, viz: P T Owen, Pink Sheritt Jas A Radford, J Mealey, Jas A Witly, Frank Cayce, E J Roberts Jas Armstrong, J N Stewart, Jno Stiles, J D Babbitt, & L Bell and the
evidence being heard, the Jury returned the following verdict, to wit: 'We of the Jury find the Defendant guilty Jno Stiles foreman' โ It is therefore considered that the Defendant is guilty as charged in the indictment, and that he make to the Commonwealth his fine for said offense by the payment of Fifty Dollars and the costs of this prosecution
A Copy att
A H Clark D. C.
