Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Stephen Hiners, Transcript
1865-10-07
- Date of Creation
- October 7, 1865
- Place of Creation
- Mason County, Kentucky
- Document Genre
- Legal/Financial
- Repository
- Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
- Collection
- Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867
- Box / Folder
- BR16-48 to BR16-49
- CWGK Accession Number
- KYR-0001-004-2530
- Rights
- This image and its transcription are freely available to the public. Images appear courtesy of Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Transcriptions and annotations were created by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. When referencing this document, please use our preferred citation.; The use of transcriptions, images, or annotations from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce any material on CWGK is required.
- FTP Identifier
- 32205414
The Civil War Governors of Kentucky editors are working on annotations for this document. Check back to explore the people, places, organizations mentioned in this document.
Citation
Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Stephen Hiners, Transcript, 1865-10-07, Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Accessed via the Civil War Governors of Kentucky Digital Documentary Edition, https://discovery.civilwargovernors.org/document/KYR-0001-004-2530 (November 13, 2026).
State of Kentucky
Mason Circuit Court } Sct
Pleas before the Hon L. W Andrews Judge of the Mason Circuit Court at the Court house thereof in the City of Maysville Kentucky on the
The Commonwealth of Kentucky Plaintiff
Against } Indictment for Permitting gaming in his house
Stephen Hiners Defendant
Be it remembered that on the
Indictment
The Grand Jury of Mason County in the name and by the authority of the Commonwealth of ^Kentucky^ accuse Stephen Hiners of the offence of permitting Gaming in his house committed as follows. The said Stephen Hiners on the [...] day of
Geo. M. Thomas
Attorney for the Commonwealth
On the back of this is the following indorsements.
"A True Bill
Samuel Forman
Foreman
2
Order for Bench warrant.
At a Court held on the
Ordered that a Bench warrant issue on the indictment against Stephen Hiners allowing him to give bail in the sum of Two hundred Dollars and the indictment is continued. Which warrant was duly executed
Order submit
At a Court held on the
By agreement of the parties the law and facts in this action are submitted to the Court for trial
Judgment
At a Court held on the
"The Court having fully heard the parties and being sufficiently advised adjudges that the defendant is guilty and that the Plaintiff recover of said Defendant the sum of Two hundred dollars, a fine, and also her costs herein expended
Order grant appeal
To which judgment of the Court the Defendant excepts The defendant prayed an appeal from the judgment herein to the Court of Appeals, which is granted, upon condition that he lodge in the Clerks office of said Court a transcript of the record on sixty days from the date of the judgment
Bill of Exceptions
The Defendant produced his bill of exceptions herein as follows Be it remembered that upon the calling of the cause of the same by agreement of the attorney for the Commonwealth of Kentucky and the defendant was submitted to the court for trial and a jury dispensed with and defendant plead not guilty. The attorney for the Commonwealth introduced Thomas Palmer who proved that the defendant Stephen Hiners lived in Mayslick
Mason County Kentucky and Kept a Bakery and Beer Saloon and suffered a game called Bagatelle to be played in a house in his occupation and under his control. I have seen persons during last March play at Bagatelle in a house in his occupation in Mayslick Mason County at which game they would agree that the person that lost at the game should pay for beer for all the party playing and ^after^ the game was through the parties would drink the beer in defendants house and the loser would pay defendant for the beer. The defendant Knew of the playing going on in his house and that persons were playing as above stated that the person loosing was to pay for the beer The game was played in the family room of the defendant adjoining the store room. Defendant is a dutchman who understands the english language imperfectly and only had the table in use about three weeks. Witness does not Know that defendant had the game stopped as soon as he heard that he was violating law but he does Know that the game was stopped in about three weeks after the table was first set up No game was played for any thing but beer as stated heretofore to wit who should pay for the Beer. This being all the testimony the court
rendered the followingment. (see same heretofore copied.) Defendant then moved the court to grant a new trial: because the Judgment of the court is contrary to the law and the testimony Because the defendant is indicted for permitting a game to be played at which money was won and the proof establishes the fact that the game was played for beer and not for money the court overrruled defendants motion and refused to grant him a new trial to which ruling defendant objected and excepted and prayed and appeal to the Court of Appeals and that this bill of exceptions be signed and sealed which his accordingly done
L W. Andrews
Judge
which having been signed and sealed by the Court, is ordered to be made a part of the record.
State of Kentucky
Mason Circuit Court } Sct
I John M Duke Jr Clerk of the Mason Circuit Court hereby certify that the foregoing few pages contain a full true and complete transcript of the record and proceedings had in the above mentioned action
Given under my hand this SeptOctober 1865
Jno M Duke Jr C. M. ct. ct.
