Winfield Smith to James T. Lewis
1865-11-22
- Date of Creation
- November 22, 1865
- Place of Creation
- Madison, Dane County, Wisconsin
- Document Genre
- Correspondence
- Repository
- Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
- Collection
- Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's Official Correspondence File, Requisitions for the Return of Fugitives from Justice, 1863-1867
- Box / Folder
- BR6-129 to BR6-130
- CWGK Accession Number
- KYR-0001-006-0102
- Rights
- This image and its transcription are freely available to the public. Images appear courtesy of Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Transcriptions and annotations were created by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. When referencing this document, please use our preferred citation.; The use of transcriptions, images, or annotations from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce any material on CWGK is required.
- FTP Identifier
- 32206505
Citation
Winfield Smith to James T. Lewis, 1865-11-22, Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's Official Correspondence File, Requisitions for the Return of Fugitives from Justice, 1863-1867, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Accessed via the Civil War Governors of Kentucky Digital Documentary Edition, https://discovery.civilwargovernors.org/document/KYR-0001-006-0102 (November 12, 2026).
{STATE OF WISCONSIN
[FORWARD]}
American Bank Note Company.
Engd by Wellstood, Hay & Whiting, New York
OFFICE OF
Attorney General
Madison,
Hon. James T. Lewis
Governor &c.
Sir: — I have at your request examined the requisition (and accompanying affidavit) of the Governor of Kentucky upon you for the rendition of Claudius Tift, an alleged fugitive from justice.
I think that the same is defective in several particulars.
It is recited in the requisition, that "Tift stands charged by indictment of John Barnes with the crime of felony &c", but no copy of the inditment has been annexed or produced to you, as required by the Act of Congress of
There is no evidence, that the original affidavit is stamped, agreeably to law.
The affidavit also fails to charge Tift with having feloniously ^stolen or^ taken the money, nor is it
alleged therein to whom the letter was addressed. I think it is essential, that it should be shown that Tift feloniously took the money out of a letter, addressed to a third party, and converted it to his ^own^ use.
Besides these points it may not be unimportant to consider the fact, that Tift, whose rendition is sought, is not charged with having committed any offence against the laws of the State of Kentucky or of the United States.
In the whole I think that the present demand ought not to be complied with, the affidavit in particular being substantially defective.
Yours respectfully,
opinion of the atty General of Wisconsin
