Stanley D. Bowers, Affidavit
1861-02-08
- Date of Creation
- February 8, 1861
- Place of Creation
- Caldwell County, Kentucky
- Document Genre
- Legal/Financial
- Repository
- Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
- Collection
- Office of the Governor, Beriah Magoffin: Governor's Official Correspondence File, Petitions for Pardons and Remissions, 1859-1862
- Box / Folder
- MG17A-126
- CWGK Accession Number
- KYR-0001-020-0054
- Rights
- This image and its transcription are freely available to the public. Images appear courtesy of Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Transcriptions and annotations were created by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. When referencing this document, please use our preferred citation.; The use of transcriptions, images, or annotations from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce any material on CWGK is required.
- FTP Identifier
- 32208464
Citation
Stanley D. Bowers, Affidavit, 1861-02-08, Office of the Governor, Beriah Magoffin: Governor's Official Correspondence File, Petitions for Pardons and Remissions, 1859-1862, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Accessed via the Civil War Governors of Kentucky Digital Documentary Edition, https://discovery.civilwargovernors.org/document/KYR-0001-020-0054 (November 12, 2026).
Stanley D. Bowers states, that he has been intimately acquainted with Thomas B. Wadlington for the last nine years, and he knows his general Moral character, and he states, that his character is that of an honest correct and peacable citizen and such is, and has been his character among his neighbors, and acquaintances generally. He further states, that he is acquainted with the character of M. A. Cartwright decd and he states, that said Cartwright was considered in his neighborhood (up to the time of his death) a dangerous, quarrelsome, and disorderly young man. and he states, that from his Knowledge of all the parties, and the circumstances connected with the Killing, he does verily believe that the evidence as given by Prince and Blalockwas untrue, and he does believe, that the verdict of the Jury does manifest injustice to said Wadlington. He does verily believe that the Killing was in necessary self-defence. He further states from the general moral character of James Blalock he does not believe that he is entitled to credit as a witness in a court of Justice.
S D Bowers
Sworn to and subscribed before me by S. D Bowers. This
J. C. Barnes D. C.
