James M. Fogle and R. H. Rountree to Beriah Magoffin
1862-03-05
- Date of Creation
- March 5, 1862
- Place of Creation
- Lebanon, Marion County, Kentucky
- Document Genre
- Correspondence
- Repository
- Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
- Collection
- Office of the Governor, Beriah Magoffin: Governor's Official Correspondence File, Petitions for Pardons and Remissions, 1859-1862
- Box / Folder
- MG23-76 to MG23-77
- CWGK Accession Number
- KYR-0001-020-1750
- Rights
- This image and its transcription are freely available to the public. Images appear courtesy of Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Transcriptions and annotations were created by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. When referencing this document, please use our preferred citation.; The use of transcriptions, images, or annotations from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce any material on CWGK is required.
- FTP Identifier
- 32210158
The Civil War Governors of Kentucky editors are working on annotations for this document. Check back to explore the people, places, organizations mentioned in this document.
- Dates
- 1862-03-05
Citation
James M. Fogle and R. H. Rountree to Beriah Magoffin, 1862-03-05, Office of the Governor, Beriah Magoffin: Governor's Official Correspondence File, Petitions for Pardons and Remissions, 1859-1862, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Accessed via the Civil War Governors of Kentucky Digital Documentary Edition, https://discovery.civilwargovernors.org/document/KYR-0001-020-1750 (November 13, 2026).
Lebanon Ky
Hon B Magoffin
Governor of Ky
Dear Sir
We were the attornys of J. P. M. Bowling the brother of R. R. Bowling (who were sons of our old and tried ^friend^ Knight Bowling of Mercer County Ky) This man J P M Bowling was very dissipated and had drank so much that we are satisfied he did not feel or Know what he had done for after he was arrested he came to our office and his conduct & demeanor satisfied us that he thought he had done something but not criminal in its character as he talked of it in a facetious
manner, he acted man like a man who felt he was in the power of others tho not upon any charge or for any cause that could disgrace. — Altho we might not have satisfied a jury (if the case had come to trial) that he wanted the lucricausa Yet we were then & are still satisfied that he did not apprehend the magnitude of the crime he was charged if he Apprehended he had committed a crime atall — Neither he nor R R Bowling have friends that could give them any pecuniary aid and we hope you may find yourself justified to remit the judgement
for we do think it a case that merits Executive Clemency.
Yours Truly
James M [Fogle]
R H Rountree
