M. J. Cook to Thomas E. Bramlette
1864-03-14
- Date of Creation
- March 14, 1864
- Place of Creation
- Mount Vernon, Rockcastle County, Kentucky
- Document Genre
- Correspondence
- Repository
- Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives
- Collection
- Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867
- Box / Folder
- BR9-402 to BR9-403
- CWGK Accession Number
- KYR-0001-004-0568
- Rights
- This image and its transcription are freely available to the public. Images appear courtesy of Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Transcriptions and annotations were created by Kentucky Historical Society staff, volunteers, and interns. When referencing this document, please use our preferred citation.; The use of transcriptions, images, or annotations from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce any material on CWGK is required.
- FTP Identifier
- 32203455
Citation
M. J. Cook to Thomas E. Bramlette, 1864-03-14, Office of the Governor, Thomas E. Bramlette: Governor's official correspondence file, petitions for pardons, remissions, and respites 1863-1867, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Accessed via the Civil War Governors of Kentucky Digital Documentary Edition, https://discovery.civilwargovernors.org/document/KYR-0001-004-0568 (November 14, 2026).
Mt. Vernon Ky
Gov. T E. Bramlette
Dear Sir I learn that a petition has been sent to you to remit a fine against one Liberty Langford of this (Rockcastle) County,
To which I do most respectfully remonstrate, for the following reasons,
He was fined ($160) dollars for obstructing a County Road by putting a fence across it in one place and gates in other places without the proper orders to do so, it was proved before the Jury that he was told when building the fence that he would be fined that he was violating law and putting the neighborhood through which the road run to great inconvinience and leaving the road almost impassible, the grand Jury presented Langford for the obstructions, and for which he was fined from
63lality; he had a fair an impartial trial before a Jury of his County, with three or four able counsel to defend him and he was fined because he was guilty Knowingly and wilfully: guilty the commonwealths Atty, after being teased a great deal agreed to dismiss the second indictment if he would pay off the one found against him, under the promise that he would remove the obstructions & c, Langford agreed; but since I learn that he is petitioning your Excellency to remit his fine, to which I seriously object, To make him pay this fine would be of incalculable benefit to the community, from the fact that Langford is called a wealthy man for the county, and it would deter him as well
others from committing similar offences, with the view of getting the fine remitted if fined; his lawyers got up the petition and I dont suppose a signer ^on it^ lives in the neighborhood of the road so obstructed, it is an easy matter to get up signers at a court where people are not interested and know not the parties, This road is in my immediate neighborhood, and I have heard the case in full, and for the forgoing reasons do most Respectfully remonstate against the remission of the fine,
M J, Cook
The above is true
W W Fish C. R. C. C
Edwin Shivel C S C R C
Rockcastle Co
Refused
Tho E Bramlette
